Question #2

---

Over the past decade, how many instances occurred in which a dog, residing in the United States, picked up and began chewing a piece of chewing gum that had been previously stepped on at a youth turf field (specifically one that uses crumb rubber pellets as infill), and was subsequently transported — unintentionally — into the dog's home environment via the shoe, bag, or personal belongings of their owner? 

For the purposes of this inquiry, the chewing gum must:

• Have originated on the turf field.
• Contained visible traces of black rubber infill pellets.
• Been unattended and found on the floor or ground of the home.
• Been actively chewed or mouthed by the dog for more than three seconds.

All answers must be sent to answers@absurdlyimpossible.com.  The subject line should contain "Question # - [Your Answer]".  So, if you think the answer to question two is 1,000 then your subject line should read "Question 2 - 1000".

Anything you include in the body of the email can and will be used against you (or, perhaps for you) in the AI powered evaluation of your answer.

If you get the question correct, you get 100 points, otherwise your answer is scored by our AI along the following 6 dimensions below.  As chances are you will not get the question correct, you should pay attention to these closely!

Did the answer make some mathematical sense, even if it was based on insane assumptions? 

Scoring here reflects if the logic flowed — even if from bad data. A wildly wrong answer can still feel “about right” based on the given logic. 

Did the explanation use clever (or ridiculous) reasoning to get from A to B?

We reward inventiveness — whether it’s triangulating from goat populations or extrapolating based on the number of cereal boxes sold in Norway.

Did the response make us laugh, smile, or audibly say “what the hell?”

Dry wit, absurd analogies, and unexpected twists in logic all score high. If it feels like a Fermi problem written by a stand-up comic, you're golden. 

Was the response easy to follow, well-written, and engaging?

A rambling wall of text? No points. A neatly explained story with clear steps, bullet points, or diagrams? Yes, chef. 

Did the answer fully embrace the ridiculous spirit of the question?

We're not looking for Excel perfection — we're looking for bold, glorious nonsense that owns the absurd premise of the challenge. 

Did they sneak in something surprisingly smart or teach us something new along the way?

Unnecessary historical facts, legit math proofs, or real-world stats used in absurd ways can earn you extra style points here.